Commentary for Bava Metzia 131:5

ההוא שכיב מרע דכתב לה גיטא לדביתהו אנגיד ואתנח אמרה ליה אמאי קא מתנחת אי קיימת דידך אנא אמר רב זביד פטומי מילי בעלמא הוא

— He replied: What was said was that it is accounted as though he had stipulated that it [the re-sale] should be voluntary.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since it is a stipulation which would come most naturally from the vendor, whereas it was actually made by the purchaser, its voluntary character is inherent. On this interpretation Raba's dictum supports Amemar. ');">⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 131:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.